AT 966

Welcome to interactive presentation, created with Publuu. Enjoy the reading!

BIG INTERVIEW

PATRICK GANGULY

18 ASIAN TRADER 27 JUNE 2025

Primarily, illicit tobacco and vape

products thrive because they are cheap.

We have seen decades of taxes imposed on

the trivial pleasure of smoking, to the

point where – after years of an ongoing

cost-of-living crisis – illegality trumps

obedience to the law.

“Consumer choice and affordability

are quite linked together, and that’s the

tobacco compel the retailer to become the

enforcer.”

In other words, when you look at these

policies and try and put them into play, the

Government is now transferring that

ownership onto the retailer, onto the

manufacturer. But that is not the retailer’s

job. The retailer is not a pseudo policeman.

The retailer is there to serve the customers

in their community.

“We are there to support the retailers,

Smugglers’ Cove

The other aspect of tobacco and vaping

legislation is, of course, the relentless

increases in tobacco tax over the decades,

which hasn’t hit vapes yet, but could well do

so (“for health reasons”) as soon as October

2026. There’s so much tax on cigarettes now

that people are increasingly patronising the

illegal market.

We know from the Laffer Curve that tax

revenue drops off quickly beyond a certain

strand of where this thing starts,” Patrick

agrees.

“If you continue to tax something to a

point where it becomes unaffordable,

either you choose to quit it, or you choose

to find substitutes and alternatives. That’s

where illicit vaping products started

coming into Australia, obviously, at a small

level initially, but then – because it’s quite

lucrative even at the lower prices – mas­

sively.

“It’s very simple, because taxation on

tobacco, for example, is almost 76 to 78 per

cent, so if you supply the product at a very

cheap price, because you’ve legally not

paid tax on it, it remains very profitable.

But it’s not profitable for the Government.

It’s not profitable for the manufacturer,

and it’s not profitable for the good actors,

for the retailers.”

There are other consequences for the

retailers in addition to the loss of rev­

enues, however – more serious and

possibly physical consequences, because

unenforceable laws affecting vapes and

but the retailer today is a under physical

threat, with attacks in-store, with the

amount of stock that they carry. Is this a

community and an environment that is

sustainable in the longer term if this

continues to happen without any inter­

vention?

“What tends to happen is there are

threats to the retailers – to their own lives

and livelihood – but ultimately you end up

in criminal warfare, gang wars,” adds

Patrick. “We’ve seen plenty of that. You

asked me the question about, where is that

in terms of UK, and is it different? So the

weather in Australia is certainly different

to the UK. But when it comes to this trend,

it’s actually quite similar.”

I ask Patrick how the industry can

respond to what looks like an impending

legislative fiasco. In a sense, companies

like Imperial Brands should be the

Government’s partner in regulating the

market, upholding standards, taking care

and making sure the distribution is tight –

Track and Trace, other forms of coopera­

tion. Ultimately, by keeping illicit actors

out of the market, the producers increase

revenue for the Government.

“They should have you as allies, but

what actually is the relationship?” I ask.

“In terms of trying to work with the

Government and giving them information

on what’s working and what’s not work­

ing, we have a very good team that is trying

to engage at every possible step of the

way,” he says.

“We work with associations to try and

bring that to life. Is the Government

listening? And is that making an impact? I

think there are facets of Government that

may be taking it into consideration, but as

a sum total, no, the Government is not

there yet.”

level. But at this point, it’s a Laffer Cliff, a

tipping point, where Government revenue

from taxing cigarettes and tobacco is

suddenly vanishing.

Having taxed tobacco so highly, back-

tracking far enough to discourage illegal

sales is almost impossible. Duties would

have to drop so low that cigarettes would

cost £5 or £6 a packet, because that’s what

illegal product is selling for.

“The first item is actually to recognize

and realize,” says Patrick. “We need to

recognize that it has become a cliff rather

than a curve, it has gone too far. Then in

terms of actions to take, again, we have sent

quite a few documents and we’ve had quite a

few discussions on this, but it could be a

static policy, rather than rolling back. Are we

pricing tobacco so much that it’s going out

of the market? Should we hold excise at a

level, and then focus on stronger reinforce­

ments of those products that are coming in

without any excise whatsoever? 38 per cent

of the market today is non-duty paid.”

True, and some people think it’s already

much higher, especially when one reads

frequently in the national press about the

rash of cash-only “barbershops” springing

up, which are suspected of laundering illicit

funds.

How can you turn back this tide?

“I think there is enough information for

the Government to act,” Patrick says. “It

really comes down to, will the Government

act? The industry continues to provide

evidence on where it’s happening and how

it’s happening, and I look at it as two areas.

One is what I call ‘into market’, and then

‘in-market’, right now.

“We have to stem it at both places. How is

[illicit product] coming into market? Where is

our border security? What are we doing? And

how do we bring that together? And then,

The government is also suffering

because we have proven, in many

ways, that it is not making the

necessary revenues that it once used

to, from tobacco

The retailer is

not a pseudo

policeman. The

retailer is there to

serve the

customers in the

community.

Made with Publuu - flipbook maker